print (PDF)
The Artworks by Ulrike Böhme
Among today's different art trends, contextualism has proved
to be an orientation that seems immune to temporary fashion. In addition,
its basic position demonstrates that it is capable of, and open to, various
alliances.
The search for orientation within a context leads to a work area of multiple
dimensions. The special characteristic of Ulrike Böhme's contextual work
is its intention to go beyond absorbing the architectural and spatial environs
- a boundary that, above all, three-dimensional abstract art has seldom exceeded
- and take functions, contents, (work) processes, the individual perceptions
of participants as an occasion to react to a semantic charging of the situation.
Consequently each project begins with her deliberate research into the special
features of the situation and the people involved so as to then, through a
conceptual act of selection and interpretation, set the stage for the artist's
reaction and the direction her physical installations and social actions will
take.
The objects she installs are among a repertoire that work with layers of glass,
in part electrically geared to switch from transparent to opaque, thereby
revealing and then concealing images, or that play with the overlaying of
partly moving images, spoken or written texts, which through the use of non-verbal
signs within the context of the respective situation allows a meaning only
imaginable through association.
In this way she creates a balance of uncertainty out of which she opens up
to the viewer a surprising new insight into the context that she had previously
found. In this way, she makes use of a clear treatment of form so that, in
an interplay of cleverly triggered stages, situations of great poetic precision
emerge.
Several projects bring persons involved in the context into her interventions,
whether they supply images or words or are present during chosen events, during
which they are not passive onlookers but become active co-creators of staged
acts.
Ulrike Böhme, like several other artists, has ventured into that in-between
zone between the classical territories of art, the bestriding of which - as
is also the case with science - is given more to innovation than remaining
within the old boundaries. By exploring the area between visual art, architecture
and three-dimensional design, she has taken up a position that, by expanding
the interpretation of context to include its semantic and social components
and - this is her distinction - by transforming it into artificially staged
social rituals, has achieved a very special and unique form.
|